National Weather Service California Nevada River Forecast Center Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service

Late November / Early December 2012 Heavy Precipitation Event
Northern California and Western Nevada
November 28 - December 03, 2012

Navigation: General Summary | Precipitation | Weather Synopsis | Hydrologic Impacts

General Summary

The final three days of November and the first two days of December saw a series of mild Pacific storms hit California in rapid succession, unleashing heavy precipitation across mainly the northern half of California and into western Nevada. Although the hydrologic impacts were relatively minor in relation to some past events, it was deemed worthy of documentation as this series of storms contained many of the same classic ingredients that often lead to disastrous flooding along the West Coast. Most notable characteristics in this particular series of storms were some of the extreme 6-hour rainfall intensities that occurred, and the high degree of forecast confidence as models were able to accurately detect this event several days in advance. That high degree of forecaster confidence translated into better-detailed advanced warning with long lead times, providing public officials and the general public critical time to prepare.

Following a week of wet weather just prior to Thanksgiving (November 22nd), longer-range models began to raise awareness to the increasing potential of another prolonged heavy precipitation event towards late November. The prospects for a more significant hydrologic event in northern California heading into late November were recognized early on, factoring in the wet antecedent conditions from this earlier storm period. From that earlier week-long series of storms, precipitation totals generally ranged between 6 and 10 inches in the wetter location across much of northern California. Fortunately from a flooding perspective, a ridge of high pressure provided an intervening stretch of dry weather that lasted from the day after Thanksgiving until the 28th, when the first in the series of late November-early December storms arrived. While that first storm on Wednesday the 28th was not all that impressive on its own merits both in terms of precipitation and runoff, it resaturated basins that had a chance to dry out since the earlier week of wet weather prior to Thanksgiving. The subsequent string of storms that followed was bolstered by a mid-latitude stream of mild Pacific air and deep moisture transported first northward, then eastward along a moisture plume that connected the subtropical Pacific between the dateline and Hawaii with northern California. The merger of this warm subtropical air and colder arctic air from a broad low pressure system in the Gulf of Alaska formed a strong upper jet across the eastern Pacific, but this area was located far enough offshore leaving northern California in a milder southwest flow pattern on the warm side of the upper jet. As a result, snow levels were elevated above the highest basins throughout much of the event, lowering only at the last moment as a final strong cold front signaled an abrupt end to the 5-day event on Sunday, December 2nd.

As the second round of heavier precipitation rolled into northern California late Thursday, December 29th and continued into Friday, December 30th, rivers responded much more sharply but held below any critical levels with the exception of the Navarro River on the north coast. Precipitation rates were impressive, exceeding 3 inches in 6 hours at times in a few locations including Brandy Creek in the Sacramento River basin, and rain gages at Venado and Angwin in the Russian and Napa basins. Precipitation then ramped up again later on Saturday afternoon and evening on the north coast of California as another surge of moist subtropical air combined with strong onshore winds, all well in advance of a strong cold front due early Sunday. It was interesting to note that temperatures at this time were very mild with nighttime readings in the upper 50s to low 60s across the area.

As anticipated well in advance, the final round of heaviest precipitation was associated with the approach of a strong cold front whose back edge would reach the coast of northern California around 5 AM PST Sunday, Dec 2nd. This final round of heavy precipitation caused many rivers to spike briefly above either monitor or flood stage levels from the north coast southward to the Russian and Napa basins. Again, 6-hour precipitation rates were equally impressive with a report of over 5 inches at Brandy Creek occurring between 10 PM PST Saturday night and 4 AM PST Sunday morning, as just one example.

On the east side of the Sierra Nevada, the Truckee River system was spared of any flooding on that Sunday, even as the final period of heaviest spillover precipitation occurred across the eastern slopes into western Nevada. In this case, the extreme sensitivity in the snow level/runoff relationship in the Truckee basin was clearly demonstrated as heavy rainfall changed over to snow in the upper basin, inhibiting runoff during the most critical precipitation period of the event. More about the impacts of snow levels on runoff in these high elevation basins can be found in the paper "An Automated Brightband Height Detection Algorithm for Use with Dopper Radar Spectral Moments". The lower elevation Susan River basin to the north didn't fare as well with flood stage exceeded by about a foot Sunday morning.


The intense precipitation observed over the northern half of the region during this period helped to push seasonal precipitation totals to well above normal for early December, setting a critical base for what would end up being a well-below-average period to follow. During the 5-day period from Nov 27 10 PM PST to Dec 2 10 PM PST, widespread precipitation totals along the coast from the Napa basin northward were in excess of 10 inches of precipitation, while totals over mountain locations were in the range of 10 to 15 inches. The second and fourth storms to pass through the region brought the highest precipitation totals to the area, driven by strong pulses in the jet stream and anomalously high precipitable water amounts. Favorable orographics also played a role in enhancing totals over coastal and mountain locations during these events, as is detailed in the Weather Synopsis section.

The following link contains an interactive map of storm-specific and overall storm-total precipitation for the period encompassing the late evening of November 27th through the late evening of December 2nd.  Data contained on the map has been quality controlled by CNRFC staff.

The table below contains links to the daily precipitation totals in gridded (quality controlled), gage (raw data), and KML format (raw data for Google™ Earth) for the 5-day period between Nov 28th at 4 AM PST and Dec 3rd at 4 AM PST, which encompassed the rounds of heavy precipitation during this significant event.

Daily Precipitation (ending 4 AM PST)
Nov 29
Nov 30
Dec 1
Dec 2
Dec 3
Northern CA
Southern CA
* Gage maps and KML files display data from automated precipitation gages and data have not been verified for accuracy.
** KML Data for Google™ Earth includes over 2000 automated precipitation gages across the Pacific Southwest region.

Gage Precipitation
Gage Location Gage ID Storm 1 Total* Storm 2 Total* Storm 3 Total* Storm 4 Total* Overall Storm Total
ALDC1 0.75 2.80 0.70 2.55 6.80
AMBC1 1.45 5.70 2.03 3.38 12.56
AAT 0.03 0.48 0.01 1.19 1.71
ANGC1 1.48 6.88 1.00 3.64 13.00
NAPC1 0.68 5.44 1.08 2.72 9.92
ADRC1 0.76 3.36 0.80 2.28 7.20
BATC1 0.23 0.52 0.39 1.53 2.67
BNDC1 1.23 6.24 1.61 5.10 14.18
BIIC1 0.94 2.59 1.44 2.91 7.88
BLSC1 0.98 3.14 0.53 4.17 8.82
BLU 1.65 6.29 1.46 4.01 13.41
BDYC1 1.72 10.48 4.12 7.16 23.48
BGVC1 1.24 5.44 1.04 3.48 11.20
BRRC1 1.51 6.56 3.64 5.05 16.76
BKLC1 2.31 8.84 3.44 6.45 21.04
CAPN2 0.14 0.90 0.03 0.99 2.06
CHWC1 0.78 3.39 0.47 2.48 7.12
CRXC1 0.39 0.87 0.19 0.59 2.04
EELC1 0.94 2.80 0.11 3.35 7.20
CRLO3 0.00 3.48 0.50 2.76 6.74
CEC 0.89 4.23 1.02 1.83 7.97
DDWC1 0.44 1.68 1.49 2.60 6.21
EKO 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.18 0.26
ELY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15
FSLC1 0.71 3.18 0.32 1.54 5.75
FTSC1 0.84 3.81 0.68 3.24 8.57
FAT 0.11 0.62 0.09 0.39 1.21
GPEN2 0.59 2.84 0.07 2.59 6.09
GASC1 0.64 5.92 3.32 3.40 13.28
GNLC1 1.41 4.75 0.92 4.50 11.58
GNFC1 0.92 1.10 0.07 2.28 4.37
GRDC1 1.80 8.24 2.80 5.33 18.17
GSCC1 0.36 0.43 0.43 1.15 2.37
HPYC1 0.27 4.08 1.22 2.69 8.26
CAHC1 0.46 1.69 0.05 0.90 3.10
HWKC1 1.67 5.69 0.90 2.31 10.57
HYFC1 0.64 2.50 0.48 2.20 5.82
HLCC1 1.05 5.25 1.88 4.02 12.20
HRZC1 1.52 5.76 3.20 2.24 12.72
HONC1 2.92 8.64 2.40 6.08 20.04
HPDC1 1.19 3.55 0.54 3.47 8.75
HNTC1 1.15 2.32 0.28 3.05 6.80
KNSN2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LMT 0.01 0.87 0.14 0.84 1.86
LPTC1 1.79 8.74 2.99 5.89 19.41
DVSC1 0.68 4.30 0.59 2.08 7.65
LSHC1 1.76 8.20 4.88 6.56 21.40
LVTC1 0.50 3.54 0.60 2.90 7.54
CQT 0.16 0.54 0.00 0.14 0.84
MDDC1 1.18 4.18 0.83 4.15 10.34
MKEC1 0.41 2.50 0.02 2.03 4.96
COEC1 0.56 2.20 0.24 2.56 5.56
YOUC1 1.27 6.00 0.79 2.72 10.78
MHS 1.13 4.52 0.54 3.12 9.31
MGTC1 0.55 1.46 0.59 1.46 4.06
RENN2 0.54 3.37 0.17 3.49 7.57
MSHC1 1.85 6.34 1.18 3.94 13.31
APC 0.72 0.85 0.21 1.30 3.08
OKNC1 0.02 2.09 0.42 2.00 4.53
OVE 0.72 1.40 0.43 1.55 4.10
OXR 0.31 0.42 0.07 0.45 1.25
PFHC1 1.08 3.96 0.44 2.84 8.32
PRMC1 0.00 0.52 0.01 0.01 0.54
PFRC1 1.73 5.44 0.86 3.23 11.26
QNYC1 1.77 5.36 0.95 4.17 12.25
RTLC1 1.28 2.92 0.80 2.32 7.32
RBL 0.94 1.64 0.10 1.58 4.26
RDD 0.86 1.31 0.04 1.44 3.65
RNO 0.22 0.42 0.00 0.72 1.36
RGCC1 0.47 0.46 0.15 1.69 2.77
SMTC1 0.47 2.09 0.58 1.51 4.65
SDCC1 0.76 2.77 0.07 2.31 5.91
SFOC1 0.38 1.46 0.39 1.54 3.77
SMCC1 1.48 2.72 0.41 1.23 5.84
SDB 0.04 0.06 0.11 0.10 0.31
STS 1.29 3.73 0.50 2.33 7.85
SWBC1 0.40 2.19 1.44 2.23 6.26
SHDC1 1.44 5.36 4.64 3.40 14.84
SLAC1 0.97 1.20 0.46 1.26 3.89
SPCC1 0.60 3.60 0.20 3.00 7.40
HICC1 0.76 5.74 1.22 3.74 11.46
STHC1 1.36 5.56 1.04 3.24 11.20
STAN2 0.16 2.01 0.00 1.57 3.74
SUPC1 0.07 1.39 0.00 0.25 1.71
SUU 0.44 1.50 0.69 1.60 4.23
TKEC1 0.64 3.18 0.47 2.83 7.12
TGCC1 0.81 3.54 0.29 3.48 8.12
UKI 1.35 3.14 0.30 3.20 7.99
VNOC1 2.08 8.80 1.56 3.60 16.04
WILC1 1.36 4.52 0.52 5.32 11.72
WMC 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.23 0.33
YYVC1 0.78 3.48 0.09 2.43 6.78
YNTC1 0.80 3.65 0.67 2.00 7.12
* Storms are defined as follows: Storm 1 (Nov 28 06Z to Nov 29 12Z), Storm 2 (Nov 29 12Z to Dec 1 06Z), Storm 3 (Dec 1 06Z to Dec 2 00Z), Storm 4 (Dec 2 00Z to Dec 3 06Z), Storm Total (Nov 28 06Z to Dec 3 06Z)

Notable 6-Hr Precipitation Totals* During the Period
Gage Location Gage ID 6-Hr Total Date Ending
Overall Ranking Monthly Ranking
FTSC1 2.04 12/02/2012 12Z 2 1
WILC1 3.16 12/02/2012 12Z 2 1
VNOC1 3.28 11/30/2012 06Z 2 1
ANGC1 3.12 11/30/2012 12Z 1 1
  2.36 12/02/2012 18Z 4 2
OKNC1 1.32 12/02/2012 12Z 1 1
AAT 0.91 12/02/2012 18Z 1 1
MHS 1.95 12/02/2012 12Z 1 1
  1.57 11/30/2012 06Z 5 1
BDYC1 5.64 12/02/2012 12Z 1 1
  3.20 11/30/2012 12Z 8 1
SHDC1 4.32 12/01/2012 18Z 1 1
  2.48 12/02/2012 12Z 3 2
DVSC1 1.58 11/30/2012 12Z 1 1
  1.50 11/30/2012 18Z 4 2
RENN2 1.93 12/02/2012 18Z 2 1
SPCC1 1.80 12/01/2012 00Z 1 (tied) 1
* Rankings are based on observations back to January 1st, 2001, which does not constitute the complete station record.

The California Department of Water Resources (CADWR) has been tracking precipitation data over the mountains of Northern CA since 1920, using data from eight precipitation gages located from Shasta Lake south into the American River basin. The 8-Station Index, as it is referred to, received anomalously high precipitation totals, nearly 13 inches, during this period of time, as can be seen in the table below. This 5-day total is 26% of the average seasonal precipitation tallied by the 8-Station Index over the course of an entire water year.

A similar index has been developed by the CADWR for quantifying precipitation over the San Joaquin basin, and is referred to as the 5-Station Index. While overall precipitation totals fell off as the series of systems pushed southward, the table below shows nearly 7 inches of accumulated precipitation during the 5-day period. This accounts for 17% of the average total seasonal precipitation over the 5-Station Index area.

8-Station Index   5-Station Index
 Date 24-Hr Precipitation*    Date 24-Hr Precipitation**
11/29/2012 1.48"   11/29/2012 0.44"
11/30/2012 4.24"   11/30/2012 2.24"
12/01/2012 2.60"   12/01/2012 1.08"
12/02/2012 3.64"   12/02/2012 1.40"
12/03/2012 0.83"   12/03/2012 1.71"
Storm Total 12.79"   Storm Total 6.87"
* 24-Hour totals ending at 8am
** 24-Hr totals from midnight to midnight
* Note 1: The 8-Station Index consists of the following locations: Mount Shasta City, Shasta Dam, Mineral, Quincy, Brush Creek, Sierraville RS, Blue Canyon, and Pacific House. Data collected since Water Year 1920-21. Average seasonal precipitation for the 8-Station Index is 50" (based on a 1922-1998 average).
** Note 2: The 5-Station Index consists of the following locations: Calaveras Big Trees, Hetch Hetchy, Yosemite National Park Headquarters, North Fork RS, and Huntington Lake. Data collected since Water Year 1904-05. Average seasonal precipitation for the 5-Station Index is 40.8" (based on a 1956-2005 average).

Weather Synopsis

Following a wet period from November 15th through the 22nd, high pressure began to build aloft across the region later in the day on the 22nd.  This provided mainly dry conditions across the region for several days leading up to the late November into early December storm event, with the exception of some minor precipitation amounts near the southern Oregon border.

Meanwhile during this dry stretch, an upper-level low pressure system formed near southwest Alaska over Bristol Bay on the morning of November 23rd.  At the same time, a second upper-level low formed near the western tip of the Aleutian Islands.  These two lows eventually merged together near the Aleutian Islands along 160W around the afternoon of the 24th into the early morning of the 25th.  By the 27th, the resultant upper-level low became anchored over the northeast Pacific Ocean near 45N/150W and became the pivot point for numerous disturbances to rotate into northern California and the Pacific Northwest through December 2nd.

The initial wave of precipitation across the region featured an upper trough swinging around the east side of the parent upper low beginning the night of November 27th through November 29th.  This trough clipped the northwest portion of California and moved into the Pacific Northwest.  While this initial system tapped into tropical moisture from the south, it moved through the region quickly, thus limiting overall precipitation totals.

Meanwhile, a low pressure system moving eastward near 30N approached the International Date Line on the 28th.  This system was responsible for drawing tropical moisture northward into the midlatitudes, and as the low crossed the Date Line, this moisture began to get entrained into the westerly flow on the southern periphery of the deep low pressure system already anchored over the northeast Pacific.  The tropical moisture combined with additional moisture already entrained in the flow and was eventually directed into northern California as part of the next system to impact the west coast.  This system impacted the region beginning early on the 29th and lasted through the 30th and was accompanied by an upper-level jet stream that at times exceeded 120 knots.  Precipitation was initially intense along a narrow band along the cold front as it moved onto the north coast.  The frontal precipitation band gradually worked its way toward the southeast into the Russian and Napa river basins and the northern Sierra Nevada by the afternoon of the 29th and continued to affect these areas through the night into early on the 30th.  Heavier precipitation finally pushed into central California later on the morning of the 30th and dissipated rapidly in the afternoon.  Conditions were conducive for fairly good lee-side (“spillover”) precipitation onto the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada crest with this system.  A batch of moderate showers pushed across northern Nevada as well from late morning into the afternoon on the 30th.

The third system to impact the region affected mainly the northern portion of California including the north coast, Lake Shasta region, and northern Sierra Nevada as an upper jet max briefly moved overhead.  Precipitation essentially lasted only around 18 hours and was largely disorganized.

The final storm in the series featured more impressive moisture values and a sharp cold front, and affected the region from the afternoon of December 1st through the evening of the 2nd.  Although precipitation was intense with this frontal system, the storm moved through the region more quickly than the previous systems thanks to a westerly upper jet that peaked near 140 knots off the coast.  One impressive feature embedded within this storm system was a convergence-induced band of convection that brought intense precipitation in the Lake Shasta area overnight from the 1st into the 2nd.  Impressive 6-hour precipitation totals included reports of 5.64 inches at Brandy Creek, just west of Lake Shasta, and 2.48 inches at Shasta Dam.  Spillover across the Sierra Nevada crest was also impressive with this system.  However, as will be discussed in greater detail later in this section, the rapidly-advancing cold air behind the frontal boundary quickly lowered snow levels in the northern Sierra Nevada on the morning of the 2nd, which had a dramatic impact in lowering the runoff in rivers on the east side of the crest.  Precipitation rapidly dissipated across the region by evening on December 2nd.

Schematic diagram of Nov 28 - Dec 02, 2012 Storms

Figure 1. General weather pattern across the Eastern Pacific Ocean and West Coast
for late November to early December 2012.

Integrated Precipitable Water (IPW) from numerous GPS-MET sensors across northern and central California and northern Nevada indicate three periods of elevated moisture levels, which correspond to each of the main waves of precipitation.  The first system showed peak IPW values around 1.1 to 1.2 inches overnight on November 29th into the 30th near the Russian and Napa basins, the San Francisco Bay Area, and the San Joaquin Valley.  The next round of moisture was a little more impressive, with IPW values topping out around 1.2 to 1.4 inches later on the 30th over much the same areas as the first system.  The wave of precipitation in the northern portion of the region on the night of November 30th into December 1st did not feature a noticeable increase in IPW values, with most of the locations receiving precipitation remaining below 1 inch of IPW.  In general, moisture levels were the highest with the final wave of precipitation, when many locations reported IPW values near 1.4 inches from the north coast all the way to the San Joaquin Valley later on the 1st into the 2nd.  IPW dropped off dramatically behind the final cold front later on December 2nd.

As noted earlier, snow levels played a particularly critical role during this storm event, especially with the last storm in the series.  The table below summarizes the evolution of snow levels as depicted by vertically-pointing radars at Lake Shasta, Oroville (at the base of the far northern Sierra Nevada), and Sugar Pine (located in the northern Sierra Nevada near I-80 at 3,500 ft elevation).  As shown by these radars, snow levels generally started out around 6,000 to 8,000 feet with the first system on the 28th.  Snow levels were more consistently around 8,000 feet on the 29th and fell to around 6,000 to 7,000 feet in the far northern Sierra Nevada and Lake Shasta area on the 30th near and behind the cold front.  In the relative lull in precipitation on December 1st, snow levels were harder for the radars to identify, and generally ranged from 6,000 to 7,000 feet near Lake Shasta and 7,000 to 9,000 feet in the northern Sierra Nevada.  Finally, snow levels rose again to 8,000-10,000 feet on the morning of December 2nd ahead of the final cold front.  Snow levels rapidly fell as low as  7,000 feet according to the radar sensors later on the 2nd as the sharp cold front moved across the region, thus turning heavy rain into heavy snow in the higher elevations of the northern Sierra Nevada.

Vertical Pointing Radar Snow Levels
Shasta Oroville Sugar Pine

Following is a link to a loop of radar data covering California and Nevada for the entire storm period. Each image is a mosaic of several National Weather Service radars, and together the images in the loop show the multiple waves of precipitation that moved across the region from the afternoon of November 28th through early morning on December 3rd.

 NOAA-NWS NEXRAD (WSR-88D) Loop (1-hour time steps)
 0.5 Deg Reflectivity Mosaic

The following table displays links to various types of satellite depictions that follow the evolution of the heavy precipitation event. The AMSU precipitable water imagery depicts the development of the tropical moisture tap near Hawaii and the advection of this moisture eastward into California and Nevada, with peak values in excess of 1.8 inches.The infrared imagery shows the enhanced cold cloud tops associated with the waves of precipitation moving into California and Nevada, and also shows several surface and upper-level low pressure systems off the west coast. The water vapor imagery reveals the upper-level lows as well as the deep subtropical moisture plume streaming into the area.

Satellite Imagery Loops
 3-Hourly Total Precipitable Water Estimates 4 PM PST Nov 27 to 4 AM PST Dec 03
 Hourly 4km Infrared (IR) Imagery 4 PM PST Nov 27 to 4 AM PST Dec 03
 3-Hourly 16km Infrared (IR) Imagery 4 PM PST Nov 27 to 4 AM PST Dec 03
 3-Hourly 16km Water Vapor (WV) Imagery 4 PM PST Nov 27 to 4 AM PST Dec 03

The following table provides links to 6-hourly NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data composites for the period of November 27, 2012 at 12Z (4 AM PST) through December 3, 2012 at 12Z (4 AM PST). This time range encompasses the entire duration of the heavy precipitaiton.  A few of the fields also include departures from normal as well.

Reanalysis Loops
 Field Loop Anomaly Loops
 250 Mb Winds Nov 27 - Dec 3 Nov 27 - Dec 3
 500 Mb Heights Nov 27 - Dec 3 Nov 27 - Dec 3
 700 Mb Winds Nov 27 - Dec 3 ---
 700 MB Relative Humidity Nov 27 - Dec 3 ---
 850 MB Winds Nov 27 - Dec 3 ---
 Mean Sea Level Pressure Nov 27 - Dec 3 Nov 27 - Dec 3
 Precipitable Water Nov 27 - Dec 3 Nov 27 - Dec 3

The table below contains links to upper-air soundings from across the region from just prior to the onset of the precipitation and continuing through the duration of the event. Some items of note in these soundings are as follows:

  • High precipitable water (PW) values, well above seasonal normals.  These PW values peaked more than 2 standard deviations above normal at KOAK, KVBG, and KLKN, and were very close to the 99th percentile at KOAK.
  • Strong southerly winds in the low-levels veering to west-southwest in the mid-levels, indicative of warm air advection. These winds also provided ideal conditions for orographically-enhanced precipitation.
  • Moderately high freezing levels, resulting in efficient warm rain processes and precipitation type remaining primarily in liquid form during the warmer portions of the storms.
Upper-Air Soundings (Radiosondes)
1200 UTC (4 AM PST) November 27 through 1200 UTC (4 AM PST) December 03
 Medford, Oregon (KMFR)
 Oakland, California (KOAK)
 Vandenberg Air Force Base (KVBG)
 Reno, Nevada (KREV)
 Elko, Nevada (KLKN)
Note: The graphics in the above links are courtesy of the University of Wyoming Department of Atmospheric Science.

Hydrologic Impacts

North Coast

Heavy precipitation north of Arcata brought numerous rivers in this area above their defined monitor stages as soils became saturated and runoff increased with each subsequent storm. However, flows along the Scott, Klamath, and Smith Rivers were not high enough to surpass defined flood stages. Slides and localized flooding were reported along area roadways, but impacts from these rising rivers was minimal.

Along the Mad River, soils increasingly became saturated with each period of precipitation during this significant event. The rounds of heavy precipitation culminated later Saturday into early Sunday with the river at Arcata (ARCC1) rapidly rising above monitor stage and peaking slightly above flood stage just before noon on December 2. The primary impact was the flooding of roads. In particular, Humboldt County Public Works closed Mad River Road to Tyee City due to the high waters. Also, flooding was reported on the road by Hammond Creek Bridge.

Much of the flooding associated with the rising Eel River was near the town of Ferndale and near the river's mouth in the Eel River Delta. The gage at Fernbridge (FRNC1) topped out 3 feet above (23 feet) its defined flood stage (20 feet) on Sunday evening. Farther upstream, two locations in the Eel River basin topped their defined monitor stage. Along the Van Duzen River at Bridgeville (BRGC1), the river topped out just over 16 feet (approximately 3 feet above monitor stage). On the South Fork of the Eel River at Miranda (MRNC1), the river clipped its monitor stage. No significant impacts were reported at these locations.

The table below includes links to hydrographs for river locations along the North Coast rivers. These hydrographs show river conditions before the periods of heavy precipition, the peaks during the event, and the recessions when the weather turned drier.

North Coast Rivers
 River  Location Hydrograph (cfs / Ft)
 Scott  Fort Jones (FTJC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Smith  Jed Smith near Crescent City (CREC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Doctor Fine Bridge (FTDC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Klamath  Klamath (KLMC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Mad  Arcata (ARCC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Van Duzen  Bridgeville (BRGC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 South Fork Eel  Miranda (MRNC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Eel  Fort Seward (FTSC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Scotia (SCOC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Fernbridge (FRNC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10

Russian / Napa / Navarro Rivers

The two significant rises on the Russian, Napa, and Navarro Rivers were the result of intense precipitation that initially fell from Thursday night (Nov 29) into Friday morning (Nov 30), and a second round Sunday morning (Dec 2). The Russian River was able to manage the increased runoff with the only critical stage threshold surpassed at Hopland (HOPC1), where the second rise crested just shy of 20 feet (monitor stage is 18 feet). There were some questions as to the validity of the data at the Hopland gage, but a USGS real-time measurement just prior to the highest peak verified stage and flow data at that time. No significant impacts were reported along the Russian River.

Heavy precipitation over the Napa River basin led to two sharp rises along the river with the second period of intense rainfall occurring less than 48 hours after the first round of heavy precipitation. With the basin becoming increasingly saturated, the Napa River at Saint Helena (SHEC1) peaked just above its flood stage on Sunday (Dec 2). The lower stretches of the river at Napa (APCC1) just clipped its monitor stage. Overall impacts were minimal. At Saint Helena flooding in the downtown area was localized, with no significant damage reported.

A double crest also occurred along the Navarro River with both peaks surpassing flood stage at Navarro (NVRC1). The first peak was on Friday morning (Nov 30) just above flood stage, while the second rise topped out approximately 7 feet above flood stage. The primary impact during this event was the closure of State Highway 128 due to flooding.

The table below includes links to hydrographs for river locations along the Russian, Napa, and Navarro Rivers. These hydrographs show river conditions before the periods of heavy precipition, the peaks during the event, and the recessions when the weather turned drier.

Russian / Napa / Navarro Rivers
 River  Location Hydrograph (cfs / Ft)
 Russian  Hopland (HOPC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Healdsburg (HEAC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Guerneville (GUEC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Napa  Saint Helena (SHEC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Napa (APCC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Navarro  Navarro (NVRC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10

Sacramento River

The majority of the increase in flows along the Sacramento River was due to contributions from the creeks below Shasta Dam. Since Shasta Lake had plenty of flood control space remaining in the reservoir going into this heavy precipitation event, releases were able to be kept at a minimum (4,700 cfs) throughout its duration. This muted the peaks on the Sacramento River. Several locations below the dam approached or surpassed their defined monitor stage, but only Tehama Bridge (TEHC1) exceeded its flood stage (213.0 feet) by 0.5 feet.

The video in the link below was taken on the morning of Sunday December 2nd near the time of the peak flow on Battle Creek at the Coleman National Fish Hatchery (operated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service). The nearby stream gage near Cottonwood (COTC1) recorded a peak stage of 10.1 feet, which corresponds to a flow of 11,842 cfs. This example represents well the contribution of the creeks below Shasta Dam to the flows in the Sacramento River.

Battle Creek - Coleman National Fish Hatchery
(Video Credit: US Fish and Wildlife Service)
AVI Video Download Link

Battle Creek - Cottonwood Hydrograph

Figure 2. Battle Creek at Cottonwood (COTC1) observed hydrograph for Nov 25th to Dec 10th.

Overall, the Sacramento River Flood Control Project was able to easily handle the increase in flows. Three of the five weirs on the Sacramento River saw overflow during the heavy precipitation event. The first weir from north to south is Moulton Weir. Flows in the Sacramento River were never high enough for water to spill over the concrete structure toward the Butte Basin. Just downstream at Colusa Weir (1 mile north of the town of Colusa), just over 4 feet of overflow was observed during the peak of the event. Water from this structure also flows toward the Butte Sink. Further downstream, Tisdale Weir (10 miles southeast of the town of Meridian) is typically the first to see overflow conditions. In fact, several peaks were observed as water overflowed into the Sutter Bypass between the evening of December 1 through the evening of December 8. Farther downstream at Fremont Weir, overflow into the Yolo Bypass was minimal as water reached just above the lip of the weir (0.4 foot). Finally, the Sacramento Weir (the only weir "opened" or "closed" on the flood control project), which consists of 48 gates, was not utilized during this heavy precipitation event as flows were not expected to reach a critical threshold at the I Street Bridge (downstream of the confluence of the Sacramento and American Rivers).

The table below includes links to hydrographs for river locations along the Sacramento River. These hydrographs show river conditions before the periods of heavy precipition, the peaks during the event, and the recessions when the weather turned drier.

Sacramento River
 River  Location Hydrograph (cfs / Ft)
 Sacramento  Bend Bridge (BDBC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Red Bluff (RDBC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Tehama Bridge (TEHC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Vina Woodson Bridge (VWBC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Hamilton City (HAMC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Ord Ferry (ORFC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Butte City (BTCC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Moulton Weir (CLSC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Colusa Weir (CLAC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Colusa Bridge (CLUC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Tisdale Weir (TISC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Fremont Weir (FMWC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10

Sacramento / San Joaquin Delta Rivers

Heavy precipitation and high snow levels resulted in increased runoff over foothill river basins east of Sacramento. The Cosumnes River saw several rises during this event with the peak occurring during the evening hours on Sunday (Dec 2), as the heaviest precipitation fell and soils became saturated. At both Michigan Bar (MHBC1) and McConnell (MCNC1) the river surpassed monitor stage. Unfortunately, an incorrect reading at McConnell showed the river level lower than what actually was being observed.

The table below includes links to hydrographs for river locations along the Cosumnes River. These hydrographs show river conditions before the periods of heavy precipition, the peaks during the event, and the recessions when the weather turned drier.

Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta Rivers
 River  Location Hydrograph (cfs / Ft)
 Cosumnes  Michigan Bar (MHBC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
* Note: The river gage at McConnell was reading lower than actual observations and not included in the table above. A peak just below 41.5 feet was estimated at 6 AM on Monday (Dec 3).

Eastern Sierra Nevada / Western Nevada River Basins

The heightened potential for flooding across eastern Sierra Nevada and extreme western Nevada river basins peaked Sunday morning as a warm moist environment brought raised snow levels and heavy spillover precipitation to the area. Lassen County personnel (including the city of Susanville) were appreciative of the accurate river forecasts well ahead of the event, which allowed for much needed preparations (2 to 3 days in advance) to limit the flood impacts along the Susan River. Debris was cleared from the channel and above bridges that cause backups, while sandbags and plastic sheeting were placed at low points along the river. Some minor flooding of yards along the Susan River in Susanville was reported during the peak of the event. County officials also stated it was fortunate that McCoy and Hog Flat Reservoirs were empty with Lake Leavitt being low, as these took a large portion of the runoff. Also, timing of this event was fortunate since soils in the basin were yet to freeze and the ground was barren of significant snow cover.

A bit farther south, river forecasts were less accurate along the Truckee River with projections of potential flooding. This was especially true in the city of Sparks and its industrial area, where expansive sandbagging efforts took place well ahead of the event. As forecast, heavy precipitation did spillover across the crest of the Sierra Nevada into extreme western Nevada. However, the key parameter that spared the Reno area from the expected flooding was a more rapid drop in the snow levels as the frontal boundary ushered in colder air. During the later morning hours of Sunday December 2, 2012, the forecast snow levels were between 8,000 and 9,000 feet. However by 10 AM PST, snow was being reported along California State Highway 89 next to the Truckee River, signaling that snow levels had already fallen to at least 6,000 feet. With the phase of the precipitation being primarily frozen in the Truckee River basin, flooding concerns subsided. Snow levels are just as important as precipitation when forecasting hydrology over eastern Sierra Nevada and extreme western Nevada river basins. If snow levels had remained between 8,000 and 9,000 feet during the period of heaviest precipitation, somewhere between 85 and 95 percent of the Truckee River basin would have received liquid precipitation. However, with the snow level down to approximately 6,000 feet by the later Sunday morning hours, only roughly 15 percent of the river basin was receiving liquid precipitation during the peak of the event.

The table below includes links to hydrographs for river locations along the Susan and Truckee Rivers. These hydrographs show river conditions before the periods of heavy precipition, the peaks during the event, and the recessions when the weather turned drier.

Eastern Sierra Nevada / Western Nevada Rivers
 River  Location Hydrograph (cfs / Ft)
 Susan  Susanville (SUSC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Truckee  Farad (FARC1) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Reno (TRRN2) Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Vista (VISN2) Nov 25 - Dec 10


Heading into the period of heavy precipitation, the three major northern California reservoirs sat well below the top of their conservation space with Shasta Lake 77% below, Lake Oroville 298% below, and Folsom Lake 53% below for November 25, 2012. As a result, releases from these flood control projects remained low and manageable. Shasta Lake was able to reduce its releases in response to added flows from the creeks below the dam making their way into the Sacramento River. Given the large amount of conservation space in Lake Oroville, releases were held nearly steady throughout the duration of the heavy precipitation event. At Folsom Lake, releases were increased to 5,000 cfs (from 1,850 cfs) for just over two days at the beginning of December as the reservoir approached its top of conservation space.

For the period of November 25 to December 10, 2012 these three reservoirs added just over 1.3 million acre-feet of storage. Shasta Lake saw the biggest jump of ~580,000 acre-feet, while Lake Oroville was a close second with ~503,000 acre-feet. Folsom Lake added ~222,000 acre-feet. As a result, all three flood control projects were closer to their top of conservation space. In fact, Folsom Lake became slightly encroached. On December 10, 2012, Shasta Lake was now 17% below, Lake Oroville 67% below, and Folsom Lake 3% above the top of conservation space.

In the table below are links to individual graphs for each of the three major northern California reservoirs, indicating: Inflows (cfs), Releases (cfs), and Storages (Ac-Ft) / Elevations (Ft).

Major Northern California Reservoirs
 Reservoir  River Basin Inflows
Storages / Elevations
(Ac-Ft / Ft)
 Shasta Lake  Sacramento Nov 25 - Dec 10 Nov 25 - Dec 10 Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Lake Oroville  Feather Nov 25 - Dec 10 Nov 25 - Dec 10 Nov 25 - Dec 10
 Folsom Lake  American Nov 25 - Dec 10 Nov 25 - Dec 10 Nov 25 - Dec 10
* Note: Releases shown on the graphs represent controlled flows from afterbays/complexes. The pairs for these reservoirs are Keswick Reservoir (Shasta Lake), Thermalito Complex (Lake Oroville), and Lake Natoma (Folsom Lake).